Why is adultery condemned by society, and it was once a crime, for example, in Brazil until 2005? It's because marriage is a tie from a man towards a woman. It is not a relationship for the sexual satisfaction of the spouses. Adultery is a married man having sexual satisfaction outside of marriage.
The preaching in Christian environment against adultery, which includes the attack against pornography and the simple close contact of a man with a woman, is contempt of man. Firstly, marriage is not directed at the happiness of the spouses. This is the almost universal practical experience of any married man, but some Christian preachers and writers still say this clearly. But that's not the worst part. Marriage councils and preaching on marital matters are to save marriages, not married people. If a man is married to a woman who consumes his life to make him unhappy, God's message is he to f$%& himself up. If the man really has an extramarital affair, if he sees pornography on the internet or if he even has closeness, for example, at workplace, with whoever woman more pleasant than his wife (not necessarily prettier), he is demonized and equated to any bastard who simply abandoned his wife for some bitch. Not only was marriage not made for the happiness of the spouses, the marriage in the typical Christian preaching exists to prevent any joy to a man. They speak of the model of Christ with the church, but, by the way, the crucifixion was only one day and it was not made by the apostles. Yes, there are women who are unhappy in the marriage too, but the case is other. And let us remember that the marriage in which the spouses choose one another is something of the twentieth-century West. The ideal of marriage by which Puritans masturbate is even worse than a typical marriage today. We already have in Genesis the case of Jacob and Leah, Jacob wanted to marry Rachel and her father cheated. They can repeat some urban legends by lesbian activists just because they find it convenient. Male preachers who defend marriage are decidedly adulterers or unsuccessful perverts, in addition to being envious of the "millenials".
Why is it that when a movie has sex, usually the sex is in a context of criminality, violence, war, adultery (which was once a crime in Brazil, for example) or contempt for women? I do not say only in conventional films until today, this was also common in pornographic films themselves until the decade of 1990. Why do the gradations in the indicative classifications today always mix sex and violence, something like if it has nude breasts, it has legal drugs or body fights? To say that this portrays how male heterosexuality is criminal or despicable, as some lesbians have said since the Second Wave of Feminism, is like talking about earthquakes believing in one of those legends in which the Earth is supported by columns, explaining real life based on fiction, not through it as a means. What is accurate in those films is that decent sex was available almost exclusively to criminal men or men in the honest population with a minimum of status. Exactly because sex is vilified. And exactly because of this, and because, therefore, sex was criminalized in practice, it was to be expected that until a little time ago, the supply of prostitution and, as some anti-pornography Christians say, the pornographic industry were operated by organized crime, protected by it or depended on schemes with politicians and public servants. Concluding thereby that male heterosexuality is in itself criminal and the degradation of women is worse than only generalizing some unhappy cases, even if they are many, it's to accept that the marginalization, the despising and the slander against the heterosexuality of the average man are evidence of that it must be even more marginalized, despised and slandered.
The "sexual exploitation of children and adolescents" is an urban legend to demonize the entire male heterosexuality. I would like to draw your attention to one detail: have you ever heard of some man who sought out the services of sexual exploitation of underages? Other: Do you know of some point of sexual exploitation of children? Watch out for the word "children", I will explain it afterwards. It is not by chance that anti-porn campaigners try to associate adult pornography with a future enjoyment for child pornography, as if they do not trust the success of other lies. It is not by chance, too, that the alarmists about the sexual exploitation of minors are the same, in Brazil, who have never said one phrase about homicide rates of more than 20 per 100,000 inhabitants per year or about the false accusations of sexual crimes. The discussion and scandal with the "sexual exploitation of children and adolescents" are so forced that they do not even separate children and adolescents. If what separates childhood from adolescence is the puberty and this puberty is the beginning of the anatomical preparation for the sexual life, talking about sexual exploitation of underages is making not distinction between people who are prepared for sexual life at least physically and people who are not even it. If is needed to gather rapes of 7-year-olds children with rapes of 14-year-old girls, and I myself have done a lot of delighful licentiousness at the age of 14, this is already proof that sexual abuse of children has not unreported cases enough to make the population more horrified than it already is, and it is an indication that even the false reports already covered the real undisclosed cases widely. But equaling sex with 14-year-old girls to sex with 7-year-old children unites the enjoyment and the interests of the crazy feminism and of the stupid conservatism.
The decisive proof that almost all real-life women have transformed whatever differences between them and men (including the, let us say, obvious differences) in meaningless paraphernalia, when not in inexhaustible sources of filth, in the bad sense, is pornography. It's not that it makes these women always intractable scoundrels, but even when such women are pleasant, solicitous, and even self-sacrificing to men, they make it as a sort of concession, usually preferable to, for example, bosses and husbands. One of these women may have an obvious difference in treatment pattern, for example, between boss and coworker, but not between boss and boss, and when there is a difference between the treatment towards a man and towards a woman, it is usually less enthusiastic treatment for man. But a man can do nonsense when he puts on a pedestal a woman who is a coworker or client just because she is a cute woman. But even a woman who treats an average man with sympathy may lose this sympathy for any sign of his heterosexuality or that she understands it as a sign of heterosexuality. It is by thinking the male heterosexuality uncomfortable or offensive that she can treat the exhibition of female nudity as disrespect. Because this woman not only sees her treatment towards men as a matter of goodwill, even if she treats average men well. She sees as offensive, in the last analysis, the very idea that a man can find little anything that the goodwill of his entire female convivial circle offers him. When this woman speaks of objectification or of a pattern of beauty (and anyone who knows a pornographic portal knows that actresses are not all beautiful or thin, for example), she adds to the contempt for the male universe a possible lack of what to offer, perhaps even for a good fuck, under a fancy image.
And it may not even look like it, here I did not even have Feminism in mind. Even in the most friendly Feminism, the fundamental differences between men and women (yes, these same ones) do not serve only to a man not to approach a woman without self-censorship or to be subjected to accusation of sexual harassment; they also serve to make a man liable to lose a job vacancy for a woman, from bus driver to multinational company executive, passing through political positions. It is not by chance that, here in Brazil, when the government by the woman Dilma Rousseff had already led us to the shrinking of national industry, to performances in PISA between the worst in the world, to the growth in the number of functional illiterates in universities, to GDP growings near zero or negative and other economic and administrative disasters, there were newspapers with head to notice that this or that city elected no woman as councilwoman in the municipal elections in 2012 and 2016.
And based on my adventures, I am a witness that the realization of even the most modest scenes of pornography is not a matter of fantasy, it is almost to commit a crime. Before I can do a DP with two friends on a deserted beach in Rio de Janeiro at night without being arrested, I'll be able to smoke marijuana there with them.
Questo testo in italiano senza film di dissolutezza in Men of Worth Newspaper: "La castità è odio contro gli uomini - parte 6", http://avezdoshomens2.over-blog.com/2017/04/la-castita-e-odio-contro-gli-uomini-parte-6.html. Questo testo in italiano con film di dissolutezza in Periódico de Los Hombres de Valía: "La castità è odio contro gli uomini - parte 6", http://avezdoshomens2.blogspot.com/2017/04/la-castita-e-odio-contro-gli-uomini-parte-6.html. Ce texte en français sans films de libertinage au Men of Worth Newspaper: "Chasteté est haine contre les hommes - partie 6", http://avezdoshomens2.over-blog.com/2017/04/chastete-est-haine-contre-les-hommes-partie-6.html. Ce texte en français avec films de libertinage au Periódico de Los Hombres de Valía: "Chasteté est haine contre les hommes - partie 6", http://avezdoshomens2.blogspot.com/2017/04/chastete-est-haine-contre-les-hommes-partie-6.html. Eso texto en español sin películas de putaría en Men of Worth Newspaper: "La castidad es odio contra los hombres - parte 6", http://avezdoshomens2.over-blog.com/2017/04/la-castidad-es-odio-contra-los-hombres-parte-6.html. Eso texto en español con películas de putaría en Periódico de Los Hombres de Valía: "La castidad es odio contra los hombres - parte 6", http://avezdoshomens2.blogspot.com/2017/04/la-castidad-es-odio-contra-los-hombres-parte-6.html. This text in English without licentiousness movies at Men of Worth Newspaper: "Chastity is hatred against men - part 6", http://avezdoshomens2.over-blog.com/2017/04/chastity-is-hatred-against-men-part-6.html. This text in English with licentiousness movies at Periódico de Los Hombres de Valía: "Chastity is hatred against men - part 6", http://avezdoshomens2.blogspot.com/2017/04/chastity-is-hatred-against-men-part-6.html. Texto original em português sem filmes de putaria no A Vez das Mulheres de Verdade: "Castidade é ódio aos homens - parte 6", http://avezdasmulheres.over-blog.com/2017/04/castidade-e-odio-aos-homens-parte-6.html. Texto original em português com filmes de putaria no A Vez dos Homens que Prestam: "Castidade é ódio aos homens - parte 6", http://avezdoshomens.blogspot.com/2017/04/castidade-e-odio-aos-homens-parte-6.html.
|BrokenTeens - Petite Teen Destroyed By Two Monster Cocks (feat. Riley Reid)|
|BrokenTeens - adolescente pequena destruída por duas pixas monstros (com Riley Reid)|
|BrokenTeens - petite adolescente détruit par deux bites monstres (avec Riley Reid)|
|BrokenTeens - pequeña adolescente destruida por dos gallos monstruos (con Riley Reid)|
|BrokenTeens - piccola adolescente distrutta da due cazzi mostri (con Riley Reid)|