Christian right-wing, it's over! - part 14: website mocks about research that links pornography to "good" Feminism four months before Pornhub launches campaign against violence against women; Christian Conservatism joins to the worst of Feminism

09/18/2015: excerpts of "Study: watching porn makes you become a fuzzy, sensitive, woman-loving feminist... somehow", by Life Site News

The porn industry must be thrilled. A new study from London's Western University has declared that, basically, watching women get abused, degraded, and beaten up on-screen can make you more feminist. The National Post reported on the study with some glee, in an article titled “Watching porn does not cause negative attitudes toward women, contentious Canadian study finds”

(...) At the very least, they say, the study calls into serious question the view that pornography is so damaging that, in one activist's words, it's “what the end of the world looks like.”

He and his colleagues analyzed data from 35 years of the General Social Survey, a government-funded U.S. project that interviews about 24,000 men and women a year on a variety of issues.

They reported in the Journal of Sex Research that the 23 per cent who reported having watched an “X-rated” movie in the previous year were no more or less likely than porn abstainers to identify as feminists, or voice support for the traditional family.

The problems with this study are myriad. As Dr. Gail Dines has already pointed out, the average age of the respondents in the survey is 45—an age that most porn researchers are not paying any attention to in the first place, and cannot be considered “average porn users” by any realistic standard. Consider these chilling statistics, for example:

35% of teen boys say they have viewed pornographic videos “more times than they can count.”

15% of boys and 9% of girls have seen child pornography.

32% of boys and 18% of girls have seen bestiality online.

39% of boys and 23% of girls have seen sexual bondage online.

83% of boys and 57% of girls have seen group sex online.

(...) In a meta-analysis of 46 studies published from 1962 to 1995, comprising a total sample of 12,323 people, researchers concluded pornographic material puts one at increased risk of committing sexual offenses (22% increase in risk) and accepting rape myths (31% increase in risk)

In a meta-analysis of 24 studies conducted between 1980 and 1993, with a total of 4,268 participants, researchers positively correlated rape myth acceptance to exposure to nonviolence or violent pornography.

Among perpetrators of sex crimes, adolescent exposure to pornography is a significant predictor of elevated violence and victim humiliation.

(...) But I'll leave you with one important question to consider: What does it say about our culture when an industry that specializes in the degradation of the feminine, the production of sexual violence, and the celebration of rape has academics that are willing to line up and claim that such material is not harmful—and can even be helpful?

Life Site News, September 18, 2015, https://www.lifesitenews.com/blogs/study-watching-porn-makes-you-become-a-fuzzy-sensitive-woman-loving-feminis. Emphasis in original.

Christy Mack & Pornhub come together to end domestic violence [VIDEO] (by Music Times)

by Staff Jan 20, 2016 17:20 PM EST

Pornhub Cares About Ending Domestic Violence - Christy Mack PSA (Photo : Screengrab, YouTube / pornhub)

Former adult film star Christy Mack, real name Christine Mackinday, has had to live in the aftermath of a violent physical and sexual assault at the hands of her ex-boyfriend, MMA fighter Jonathan Koppenhaver, a.k.a. War Machine, in 2014. Unfortunately, because of her previous career in the XXX industry, numerous critics and naysayers have downplayed the sexual assault that occurred, because of the "porn stars can't be raped" argument that stemmed from the bowels of the Internet. In 2016, though, Mack is taking a stance and joining forces with the NSFW website Pornhub to bring an end to domestic violence.

This new project is called "Pornhub Cares" and aims to raise awareness and hopefully bring an end to domestic violence. All proceeds from this project go directly to a domestic violence charity of the former porn star's choosing. So how will they raise money? Well, this partnership is producing a clothing line that features Mack in all of her glory, if you catch our drift.

We're not psychic or anything, but we think that this new plan could raise millions for the lucky charity. Wouldn't you like a shirt with Christy Mack on it? It's for a good cause, you guys!

You can watch a video announcement of "Pornhub Cares," featuring Mack speaking about this very personal issue of hers and so many other victims around the world (via UPROXX):

As you probably know, Mack had to undergo plenty of plastic surgery to reconstruct her face after Koppenhaver almost beat her to death. It is believed that if she had not managed to escape, she would've been killed that night in 2014.

"Christy Mack & Pornhub Come Together to End Domestic Violence [VIDEO]", Music Times, January 20, 2016, http://www.musictimes.com/articles/62584/20160120/christy-mack-pornhub-come-together-end-domestic-violence-video.htm

Christy Mack Collection (by Pornhub)

by: ARIA

We're so excited to announce the launch of Pornhub Apparel's second collection! This time, Pornhub Cares and Pornhub Apparel have come together to partner with renowned adult film star Christy Mack to launch a limited edition apparel line to raise awareness for domestic violence. 100% of profits will be donated to a charity of Christy's choosing. For our sophomore collection, we chose to create a line of tees and tanks to raise awareness for and help support this important cause. Featuring fierce and powerful images of and personally chosen by the Christy, these unique designs not only bring boldness to any outfit, they also support a great cause.

"Ending domestic violence is a cause that is close to my heart and I'm very proud of this collaboration with Pornhub, I'm really looking forward to making my donation with the proceeds from the clothing line so I hope the shirts sell out quickly!" - Christy Mack

For more information please visit http://www.pornhub.com/cares/end-domestic-violence

Pornhub Blog, January 20, 2016, http://www.pornhub.com/blog/3031

Comments by Men of Worth Newspaper / Periódico de Los Hombres de Valía

Would you be surprised if, in a short term, the human dignity of a porn actress or a former porn actress is associated to Feminism and Liberalism, not some Pink Cross, while those words "there are not rapes of porn actresses" are associated to Conservative Christian thought? Where were the anti-porn when they knew about this case? To them, Christy Mack only would have dignity if she got out the porn industry, what does not mean that LifeSiteNews, and those likewise, think she deserved what happened.

But while the anti-porn Conservative Christians (right-wing until State outlaws what their peasant fat ugly aunts dislike) come together to Feminists who hate sex like Gail Dines, Pornhub performs "good" Feminism, campaigning against the same violence by men against women they say pornography promotes.

We can see here four problems:

1) Feminism in its whole encompasses here the ALMOST ENTIRETY of speeches, even the actions of its self-claimed opponents. Life Site News has articles against abortion and LGBT Movement, but it takes seriously the lesbian feminist activist Gail Dines exactly because she says what the sexually frustrated elderly in the churches want to convince themselves it's true. Porhnub and Christy Mack are defending women's rights, anti-porn Puritans struggle against them in the name of the same women dignity. But porn industry seems to join to the best of Feminism; Christian Conservatism, to the worst. Ah, what would they say if one says that Christianity lowered and killed women for two millenia? They would speak about how Christianity has always been more feminist than Feminism (probably, how a beautiful young lady multiplies her dignity if she does not have sex with men, even more if she does not show her body to them).

2) This particular case can be a sample of the historical logical, intelectual and scientific limitations of the Christian Conservatism and, further, of Conservatives walking side by side with the worst of Socialist militancy in its mental and rhetorical vices, like debasing contrary arguments. In this particular case, if we had a sample of porn male users with an average of 45 years old in the research in 2015, its average in 1995, year of some researches quoted by LifeSiteNews, was 25. Is this something realistic to study pornography effects, Gail Dines and Jonathon Van Maren? But what happened to those cruel rapists of 20 years ago for they to become feminists now? LifeSite lets something escape: "the problems with this study are myriad", "the study calls into serious question the view that pornography is what the end of the world looks like", so, "consider these chilling statistics".

3) Not only there are two groups, the people who denounce the evil of porn sites and the people who seem they had accessed some porn site. Not only the adolescent males who heard the first group will think "how idiocy!" if they saw a porn content after they heard it or "are you kidding me?" if they saw it before. This action by Pornhub can, further than give it a positive image, remind us that their defamers were the same who had spoken, half century ago, horrible things about university, television, theatre, soccer, internet and even others sections within Christianity itself. More than it, those who say themselves anti-Feminists and preach against pornography, prostitution and a alleged feminine promiscuity will consolidate an image of themselves as delirant liars with a Middle Age level stupidity, who can only lie, fortunately, among themselves.

The fourth problem, I will show later. Though I am an Atheist, pro-pornography, pro-prostitution, anti-religion, pro-licentiousness girl, I oppose to Feminism and gynocentrism too. That's why I am worried about this all: Conservative Christians like these can give an image to ANTI-FEMINISM AS A WHOLE as a set of compulsive lies and misinformation from the most backward countryside. Thus, they can lead us to a world where nothing will be publicly debatable, if it's ever intellectually conceived, if it does not benefit women first and foremost or it threats the putrid part of feminine universe. Incidentally, who remembered that "domestic violence" can be by a woman victimizing a man?

To the end, I will repeat a piece of my text "The Puritan-Feminism episode 25..." (http://avezdoshomens2.blogspot.com/2015/09/the-puritan-feminism-episode-25-one.html). I wrote it September 25, 2015, four months ago and, I had not seen it, one week after Life Site News' text, commenting the article "Watching porn does not cause negative attitudes to women, study finds" published at The Independent, September 12, 2015. Now, that fourth problem:

But I wrote in several texts in the last three months that myriads of very ethical and very intelligent persons had been delivered to the socialist militancy by the anti-intellectual puritan Christians until the left-wing governments and militants had shown, recently, that they are able to be even worse, and I wrote on April about how the lies in Christian environment about pornography will bury the Christianism ("Lies that do not work and the truth about pornography: why does not tarry full burial of Christianity", http://avezdoshomens2.blogspot.com/2015/04/lies-that-do-not-work-and-truth-about.html). Fuck! Incidentally, I wrote "The Puritan-Feminism episode 9: some conservative and evangelical women uniting with feminists to censor pornography (and what else?)" (http://avezdoshomens2.blogspot.com/2013/12/the-puritan-feminism-episode-9-some.html) in December 2013, about Gail Dines, mentioned in this article, joining with feminine Christian leaderships in Canada, where those researchers are, to censor porn in internet countrywide as happened in United Kingdom, where the author of this article Alexandra Sims was.

Does it sound boring the "I wrote" in the previous paragraph? Here's the point! How much is the confirmation rate of Conservative Christian analysis about whatever? Incidentally, how about the legalization of pedophilia or the "socialization of the women" which Karl Marx refuted in mid nineteenth century? In that article, there are not surprises to male porn fans, but here is a researcher saying something very similar to tens of serious researches published in the last 20 years at minimum, destroying hoaxes used for decades by Christian preachers and lesbo-feminists as if they had some basis in the reality.

(...) The Socialism will be defeated only with the dissemination of the mental normality and of the individual power. It makes not sense speaking of individual liberties where the individual experience of the sexual pleasure is repressed through the criminalization of the pornography and of the prostitution. And the Christian right-wing will not be a cultural leadership force when a simple girl as I writes something, only by observation of everyday life plus normal reasoning, six years before it happens and they did not even realized what is going on even when it's already happening. The right-wing Christian puritanism is only surviving because and while the leftists can fit it in their own projects. Assuming that porn male costumers, and increasingly more porn female consumers, are liberal, what will we have? The Christian traditional churches will collapse, at least as they were known in 60's. The Conservative wing will collapse with them. The Liberalism will casually discard its more grotesque part, as if it was a stupid error or something "Conservative Christian", and that's all.

Abigail Pereira Aranha

	Questo testo in italiano senza filmati di dissolutezza in Men of Worth Newspaper: "Destra cristiana, è finito! - parte 14: sito fa beffe sulla ricerca che collega pornografia al 'buono' Femminismo quattro mesi prima Pornhub lanciare campagna contro la violenza contro le donne; il Conservatorismo cristiano si unisce al peggiore di Femminismo", http://avezdoshomens2.over-blog.com/2016/01/destra-cristiana-e-finito-parte-14.html.
	Questo testo in italiano con filmati di dissolutezza in Periódico de Los Hombres de Valía: "Destra cristiana, è finito! - parte 14: sito fa beffe sulla ricerca che collega pornografia al 'buono' Femminismo quattro mesi prima Pornhub lanciare campagna contro la violenza contro le donne; il Conservatorismo cristiano si unisce al peggiore di Femminismo", http://avezdoshomens2.blogspot.com/2016/01/destra-cristiana-e-finito-parte-14-sito.html.
	Ce texte en français sans films de libertinage au Men of Worth Newspaper: "Droite chrétienne, est fini! - partie 14: site web se moque sur la recherche qui relie la pornographie à il 'bon' Féminisme quatre mois avant Pornhub lancent une campagne contre la violence contre les femmes; il Conservatisme chrétien se joint à la pire du Féminisme", http://avezdoshomens2.over-blog.com/2016/01/droite-chretienne-est-fini-partie-14.html.
	Ce texte en français avec films de libertinage au Periódico de Los Hombres de Valía: "Droite chrétienne, est fini! - partie 14: site web se moque sur la recherche qui relie la pornographie à il 'bon' Féminisme quatre mois avant Pornhub lancent une campagne contre la violence contre les femmes; il Conservatisme chrétien se joint à la pire du Féminisme", http://avezdoshomens2.blogspot.com/2016/01/droite-chretienne-est-fini-partie-14.html.
	Eso texto en español sin películas de putaría en Men of Worth Newspaper: "Derecha cristiana, ¡se acabó! - parte 14: página web se burla de la investigación que vincula pornografía al Feminismo 'bueno' cuatro meses antes de Pornhub lanzar campaña contra la violencia contra las mujeres; el Conservadurismo cristiano se une al peor del Feminismo", http://avezdoshomens2.over-blog.com/2016/01/derecha-cristiana-se-acabo-parte-14.html.
	Eso texto en español con películas de putaría en Periódico de Los Hombres de Valía: "Derecha cristiana, ¡se acabó! - parte 14: página web se burla de la investigación que vincula pornografía al Feminismo 'bueno' cuatro meses antes de Pornhub lanzar campaña contra la violencia contra las mujeres; el Conservadurismo cristiano se une al peor del Feminismo", http://avezdoshomens2.blogspot.com/2016/01/derecha-cristiana-se-acabo-parte-14.html.
	This text in English without licentiousness movies at Men of Worth Newspaper: "Christian right-wing, it's over! - part 14: website mocks about research that links pornography to 'good' Feminism four months before Pornhub launches campaign against violence against women; Christian Conservatism joins to the worst of Feminism", http://avezdoshomens2.over-blog.com/2016/01/christian-right-wing-its-over-part-14.html.
	This text in English with licentiousness movies at Periódico de Los Hombres de Valía: "Christian right-wing, it's over! - part 14: website mocks about research that links pornography to 'good' Feminism four months before Pornhub launches campaign against violence against women; Christian Conservatism joins to the worst of Feminism", http://avezdoshomens2.blogspot.com/2016/01/christian-right-wing-its-over-part-14.html.
	Texto original em português sem filmes de putaria no A Vez das Mulheres de Verdade: "Direita cristã, acabou! - parte 14: página zomba de pesquisa que liga pornografia ao Feminismo 'bom' quatro meses antes de o Pornhub lançar campanha contra violência contra a mulher; o Conservadorismo cristão se une ao pior do Feminismo", http://avezdasmulheres.over-blog.com/2016/01/direita-crista-acabou-parte-14.html.
	Texto original em português com filmes de putaria no A Vez dos Homens que Prestam: "Direita cristã, acabou! - parte 14: página zomba de pesquisa que liga pornografia ao Feminismo 'bom' quatro meses antes de o Pornhub lançar campanha contra violência contra a mulher; o Conservadorismo cristão se une ao pior do Feminismo", http://avezdoshomens.blogspot.com/2016/01/direita-crista-acabou-parte-14-pagina.html.

	Seção de sexo, safadeza, putaria, mulher pelada, pornografia
	Section of sex, lust, licentiousness, naked woman, pornography
	Section de sexe, luxure, débauche, femmes nues, pornographie
	Sezione de sesso, libertinaggio, lussuria, donna nuda, pornografia
	Sección de sexo, perrez, putaría, mujer desnuda, pornografía

	Christy Mack - Rebellious Daughter
	Christy Mack - Filha Rebelde
	Christy Mack - Fille Rebelle
	Christy Mack - Hija Rebelde
	Christy Mack - Figlia Ribelle

	GILF Nina Hartley gets an anal (GILF: Granny I'd Like to Fuck) The Humanist: You're a self-described radical feminist. Please explain what a radical feminist is. Nina Hartley: I'm a feminist and some of my ideas are radical, but I'm not a "radical feminist," which occupies its own sub-division of feminist thought. Radical feminists, for all their bloviating and over-intellectualizing about it, really, really just don't like men. Period. Their philosophy boils down to "Men bad. Women good." I reject that notion categorically. Unfortunately, the "men bad, women good" meme has taken hold in the public consciousness and people now think that feminists don't like sex or men, which is bunk. I'm more a classical liberal feminist: equal pay for equal work, on-site day care, single-payer health coverage, equal opportunity through skills and aptitude instead of gender, generous maternity and paternity leave, and the like. I believe that men and women are both victimized by the patriarchal culture, just in different ways, by different means, for different reasons, and with different results. I'm well hated in radical feminist circles for the supposed harm I do to women and by the fact that I have sex on camera, both for and with men. I no longer try to talk to them, as I realize radical feminists are just another form of hate group. They really believe that women can't consent to any sexual encounter and I categorically reject that. "Atheism, Ethics, and Pornography: An Interview with Nina Hartley", The Humanist, August 26, 2010, http://thehumanist.com/magazine/september-october-2010/features/atheism-ethics-and-pornography-an-interview-with-nina-hartley.
	GILF Nina Hartley leva um anal (GILF: "Granny I'd Like to Fuck", vovó que eu gostaria de foder) The Humanist: Você é uma auto-descrita feminista radical. Por favor, explique o que é uma feminista radical é. Nina Hartley: Eu sou uma feminista e algumas das minhas ideias são radicais, mas eu não sou uma "radical feminista", que ocupa sua própria sub-divisão do pensamento feminista. Feministas radicais, por toda a sua verborragia e superintelectualização sobre isso, realmente só não gostam de homens. Ponto. Sua filosofia se resume a "Homens maus. Mulheres boas." Eu rejeito essa noção categoricamente. Infelizmente, o meme "homens maus, mulheres boas" fecundou na consciência pública e agora pensam que as feministas não gostam de sexo ou homens, o que é mentira. Eu sou mais uma feminista clássica de esquerda: igualdade de remuneração para trabalho igual, creche no local, cobertura de saúde de pagamento único, igualdade de oportunidades com habilidades e aptidão em vez de gênero, maternidade e paternidade generosas, e afins. Eu acredito que homens e mulheres são ambos vitimados pela cultura patriarcal, só de diferentes maneiras, por meios diferentes, por diferentes razões e com resultados diferentes. Eu sou bem odiada em círculos feministas radicais pelo suposto mal que eu faço para as mulheres e pelo fato de que eu faça sexo na câmera, para e com os homens. Eu já não tento falar com elas, como eu percebo que feministas radicais são apenas outra forma de grupo de ódio. Eles realmente acreditam que as mulheres não podem consentir qualquer encontro sexual e eu rejeito categoricamente isso. "Atheism, Ethics, and Pornography: An Interview with Nina Hartley" (Ateísmo, ética e pornografia: entrevista com Nina Hartley), The Humanist, 26 de agosto de 2010, http://thehumanist.com/magazine/september-october-2010/features/atheism-ethics-and-pornography-an-interview-with-nina-hartley.
	GILF Nina Hartley prend une anale (GILF: "Granny I'd Like to Fuck", mamie je voudrais baiser) The Humanist: Tu es une décrit lui-même féministe radicale. S'il vous plaît expliquer ce qu'est un féministe radicale est. Nina Hartley: Je suis féministe et certaines de mes idées sont radicales, mais je ne suis pas une "féministe radicale", qui occupe son propre sous-division de la pensée féministe. Les féministes radicales, pour tout leur verbiage et plus-intellectualisation à ce sujet, vraiment, vraiment tout simplement pas apprécient les hommes. Point final. Leur philosophie se résume à "Hommes mauvais. Femmes bonnes." Je rejette catégoriquement cette idée. Malheureusement, le mème "hommes mauvais, femmes bonnes" a pris racine dans la conscience publique et les gens pensent maintenant que les féministes ne aiment le sexe ou les hommes, qui est un mensonge. Je suis plus une féministe de gauche classique: un salaire égal pour un travail égal, la garde d'enfants sur place, la couverture de santé à payeur unique, l'égalité des chances grâce à des compétences et des aptitudes à la place de l'égalité, maternité et paternité généreuses, et autres. Je crois que les hommes et les femmes sont à la fois victimes de la culture patriarcale, juste de différentes manières, par des moyens différents, pour des raisons différentes, et avec des résultats différents. Je suis bien détesté dans les cercles féministes radicales pour le préjudice supposé que je fais pour les femmes et par le fait que je fais sexe à la caméra, à la fois pour et avec les hommes. Je ne cherche plus à leur parler, je me rends compte que les féministes radicales sont juste une autre forme de groupe de haine. Elles croient vraiment que les femmes ne peuvent pas consentir à toute rencontre sexuelle, et je rejette catégoriquement. "Atheism, Ethics, and Pornography: An Interview with Nina Hartley" (Athéisme, l'éthique et la pornographie: une entrevue avec Nina Hartley), The Humanist, 26 de août de 2010, http://thehumanist.com/magazine/september-october-2010/features/atheism-ethics-and-pornography-an-interview-with-nina-hartley.
	Gilf Nina Hartley lleva un anal (GILF: "Granny I'd Like to Fuck", abuela me gustaría follar) The Humanist: Eres una autodenominada feminista radical. Por favor, explique lo que una feminista radical es. Nina Hartley: Soy feminista y algunas de mis ideas son radicales, pero yo no soy una "feminista radical", que ocupa su propia subdivisión del pensamiento feminista. Las feministas radicales, por toda su verborrea y el exceso de intelectualización acerca de eso, realmente, realmente no les gusta los hombres. Período. Su filosofía se resume en "Hombres malos. Mujeres buenas." Rechazo esa idea categóricamente. Por desgracia, lo meme "hombres malos, mujeres buenas" ha arraigado en la conciencia pública y la gente piensa ahora que las feministas no les gusta el sexo o los hombres, lo que es una tontería. Yo soy más una feminista de izquierda clásica: igual salario por igual trabajo, cuidado de niños en el lugar, la cobertura de salud de pagador único, igualdad de oportunidades a través de habilidades y aptitudes en lugar de género, maternidad y paternidad generosas, y similares. Yo creo que los hombres y las mujeres son a la vez víctimas de la cultura patriarcal, sólo que en diferentes maneras, por diferentes medios, por diferentes razones, y con diferentes resultados. Yo soy bien odiaba en los círculos feministas radicales por el supuesto daño que hago a las mujeres y por el hecho de que tengo relaciones sexuales en cámara, tanto para y con los hombres. Ya no trato de hablar con ellas, ya que me doy cuenta de las feministas radicales son sólo otra forma de grupo de odio. Ellas realmente creen que las mujeres no pueden dar su consentimiento para cualquier encuentro sexual y yo categóricamente rechazo eso. "Atheism, Ethics, and Pornography: An Interview with Nina Hartley" (Ateísmo, Ética, y la pornografía: una entrevista con Nina Hartley), The Humanist, 26 de agosto de 2010, http://thehumanist.com/magazine/september-october-2010/features/atheism-ethics-and-pornography-an-interview-with-nina-hartley.
	GILF Nina Hartley prende un anale (GILF: "Granny I'd Like to Fuck", nonna vorrei scopare) The Humanist: Sei una femminista radicale auto-descritta. Si prega di spiegare quello che una femminista radicale. Nina Hartley: Sono una femminista e alcune delle mie idee sono radicali, ma io non sono una "femminista radicale", che occupa la propria suddivisione del pensiero femminista. Femministe radicali, per tutta la loro prolissità e super-intellettualizzazione a questo proposito, davvero, davvero non le piace agli uomini. Periodo. La loro filosofia si riassume in "Uomini cattivi. Donne buone". Io respingo categoricamente tale nozione. Purtroppo, gli "uomini cattivi, donne buone" meme ha preso piede nella coscienza pubblica e la gente ora pensano che le femministe non le piace il sesso e gli uomini, che è una bugia. Sono più di una classica femminista di sinistra: la parità di retribuzione a parità di lavoro, servizi per l'infanzia sul posto, copertura sanitaria singolo contribuente, pari opportunità attraverso le competenze e l'attitudine al posto del genere, maternità e paternità generose, e simili. Credo che gli uomini e le donne sono entrambi vittime di cultura patriarcale, solo in modi diversi, con diversi mezzi, per diversi motivi, e con risultati diversi. Io sono bene odiata nei circoli femministi radicali per il danno presunto che devo fare per le donne e per il fatto che faccio sesso sulla camera, sia per e con gli uomini. Io no cerco più di parlare con loro, come mi rendo conto femministe radicali sono solo un'altra forma di gruppo di odio. Loro davvero credono che le donne non possono acconsentire a qualsiasi incontro sessuale ed io categoricamente rifiuto questo. "Atheism, Ethics, and Pornography: An Interview with Nina Hartley" (Ateismo, Etica, e pornografia: un'intervista a Nina Hartley), The Humanist, 26 di agosto di 2010, http://thehumanist.com/magazine/september-october-2010/features/atheism-ethics-and-pornography-an-interview-with-nina-hartley.