sabato 9 aprile 2016

The countryside of anti-feminism

Abigail Pereira Aranha

The world in the days of French Revolution, Communist Manifesto or Second Wave of Feminism had much poverty, power abuse, diseases and discomfort. Because of it, the people who were already mostly peasant and illiterate were also rude, sexually frustrated, anti-intellectual, fearful or alcoholic and almost always unhappy, in any country or province and almost every city in the Christian world. Traditional family was where parents could have some power, more than some peace. The children in a typical family were at mercy of unskilled illiterates, receiving physical-moral abuse instead discipline and nonsense instead knowledge. Exception, what a surprise!, when these children were taught in labor life. The kids grew, they married someone their parents chose and they could experience, so, the only thing recognizable as maturity: having someone smaller to make as unhappy and provincial as themselves, and, to the boys, having a daughter through whom they will try to make the sexual life of some boys as frustrated as their own when they were that age.

But if 99% of population do not have mental capacity to perceive something wrong as wrong or moral capacity to, at least, talk about it as something wrong, it does not imply that those who have these all are who have something wrong, so their wisdom will be hearing the insane scream of the moral-intellectual mediocres until they look like the "normal" people. Any leftist militant in the high school understands it. Here is where Conservatism bankrupts.

Christian Conservatives, specially so-called anti-feminist Conservative women, criticize Liberalism and leftist Feminism more because of its hits than of its mistakes. If you know about relative movement, you know that two objects moving in relation to a reference system can be considered in movement one in relation to the other, as if the origin of the reference system was in that first one. Those same distance unit and time unit used to describe movement in that first system will be used here. The nowadays rural areas have changed since late 19th century; the urban areas, too; the social-political life in both, too. But if I set as reference standard the countryside life in late 19th century, I will find a society ill only because it differs so much from that standard, whether this difference is to better, whether it's really worse. So, if the distance of 4 kilometers was what people in rural areas walked to a bus stop in a not paved road and we travel it, nowadays, in a city bus from a bus stop 200 meters far our home to a commercial area, we are hedonists; if we know the difference from wisdom to voice imposition of peasant mummies and we refute even university teachers and state officials, we lost respect to authorities; if I have sex with 5 men in a week and I have orgasm with all of them, but my grandmother would never imagine she having it (5 men and orgasm) in her whole life, I am a depraved and a future STD ill; if 15-years-old girls used to be married in 19th century and nowadays they had Sexual Education in their schools before they had a boyfriend, our government is promoting pedophilia. And so on.

While Socialism had success because it struck Conservatism-Libertarianism in its failures, Feminism has been successful because Christian Conservatism has supported gynocentrism. Here's why the so-called Christian Conservative feminine anti-Feminism has been, after all, an imitation of envious defamation by undesirable countryside cows and their unhappy husbands against the large cities girls. The strikes and conflicts between workers and bosses in 19th century happened because, to leftists, they were needed. The Slut Walk happened because it could (though it would be better, to the boys, if the participants were as pleasant as the FEMEN girls). Here's why Phyllis Schlafly and Suzanne Venker condemn Feminism in their book "The Flipside of Feminism" (yeah, I made a play of words in the title) for not being good to women. Here's why not only the Men's Rights Movement was born with men leaving the Feminist movement, a Christian preacher who is not interested about mention married or divorced men suicide in pulpit much likely made a special sermon to the Sunday in the week of this last International Women's Day.

As values by themselves, traditional Western family, traditional Western marriage, Capitalism, hierarchies and "morals" need less enemies to collapse than huge forces to be sustained. It's not casual that the event in the Christian world that was as turbulent as French Revolution before Socialist movement was Protestantism, little more than an Catholic internal controversy. It's not casual, too, that a little before the epoch of Communist Manifesto, "atheist" was an insult and hardly someone would say oneself as such. The Communist Manifesto and the success thereafter of the Socialist movement is the evidence that Christian Conservatism had only withstood for 15 centuries because not only it did not face significative enemies, it hardly saw even questioners who achieved to write their thoughts and reach people who could read.

Conservatism is being buried because it has more commitment with old-fashioned myths than with present reality. Here's why Conservatives in general and Christian traditional women specially could say that Feminism advocates man-hating and lesbianism and that it's guilty for a supposed sexual availability of women to men, until the real Feminism brought them real troubles, among them an increasing number of men uninterested or fearful regarding marriage or even to be kind to a "lady". Or why a Conservative man can say that all women are promiscuous and he is still a virgin having more than 25 years old because all women reject him. Is leftism who stops Conservatism, not vice versa. Who can stop leftism, like it has happened, is its own insanity.

A good example of this all is in the text "Men Aren't Fighting for Women Anymore, and Why Should They?" at Matt Forney blog: "Should you fight for the women of your country?" "Fifty years ago, this question wouldn't even be a debate". Well, if we take these "fifty years" literally, we find 1966, it was when SCUM Manifesto was being written. So, let's go to 1959. It was the year of "Cuban Revolution". Communist Manifesto was published A HUNDRED ELEVEN YEARS before. "Perils of the Marxist State", by former Socialist Mikhail Bakunin, was published 49 years before. Only the Soviet Union had 37 years. The First Wave of Feminism was about to be replaced with the second in the following decade. But we have more problems here:

1) Were men, that year, less likely to be falsely accused of rape or sexual harassment, if not attacked or murdered by some illiterate rude man before or without being reported to police? No!

2) Were men much less than 90 per cent of deaths or injuries in labour accidents? No!

3) Did men have more availability of prostitution and pornography, or merely more easiness to chat with a woman in the streets? No! Incidentally, what used to happen when a man achieved to have sex with his girlfriend before marriage?

4) If a father had authority in his house, was it more than the burdens he took in being the head of household? Better: was the respect he had in home a convenient wage from his wife for something much bigger he previously did and he would do?

5) What made the author write this text is an Islamic rape assault in Germany. These same Islamics were seen by Conservatives as a force against Feminism 5 or 10 years before, merely because the Muslim women wear burka. It was before these Arabs make mess in their own (Conservatives) homeland. It shows how false moralist virgin boys, envious of whoever seems to have more sexual life quality, can help to end up what remains of good in their societies and their own lives. If I can not be read and taken seriously by the worldwide Conservatives who admire women from some parts of Asia, they can import with them the Feminism like it has entered, for example, India or Saudi Arabia.

Provincial thought, a large capacity of satisfaction with the overall frustration and a large number of enraged 20-25 years old virgin boys, that's what makes nowadays Conservatives to depict the early 60s as a kind of lost paradise. It's kindness to consider Christian Conservatism as a world-view: it's a system of ideas that is closed to the world enough to Conservative people not to notice that it's taken less and less seriously for 50 years, I don't say by the wicked world, but within historical churches themselves.

The Socialist-Feminist movement did not grow only because it had heavy funding and it entered in universities, mass media and arts; Socialist-Feminist movement gathered intellectuals because Christian Conservative environments were somewhat hostile to intelligent persons while Liberals were saying something lucid. Defending the truth or fighting against the evil for not genuine reasons or reaching this truth accidentally among lots of mistakes does not lower the truth in itself. But the work in this direction will be limited by its source, and the public image of the truth itself within this work can be damaged. So, when Feminism made mess enough to damage visibly men-women relationships, Politics, Justice and other areas in the social life, and only then, this Feminism found more limits than in decades of Conservative preaching.

Down to Feminism! Viva Atheism and prostitution!


"Men Aren't Fighting for Women Anymore, and Why Should They?", Kyle (at Matt Forney's blog), January 15, 2016. Available at

Men Aren’t Fighting for Women Anymore, and Why Should They?

January 15, 2016 By


This is a guest post by Kyle from This is Trouble.

As refugees continue to flood the European borders, the number of rapes occurring to local European women are rising at “alarming” rates. Perhaps alarming for the liberal movement determined to let these invaders take over Europe, but certainly not alarming for any of us who live in a world of reality. Yes, the idea to allow thousands of young men with high sex drives, who come from a a cultural with a history rich of rape and violence, into Western countries with no real plan or ability to enforce the law is brilliant.

Nothing could go wrong.

The same people preaching about open borders and catering to help refugees (even at the expense of their own people) are somehow the same people who advocate for gay rights. They want to allow the refugees whose culture routinely kills homosexuals into the country.

Do they not know that Muslims throw gays off of roofs (warning: graphic photos), or shoot them in public?

Again, how they thought that allowing all the brown refugees in would result in a peaceful situation is beyond me.

Meanwhile, after the Cologne attacks—in which a thousand refugees were connected to assaulting German women—people have been calling on German men to stand up and fight for them. In times of need, note that all cries of gender equality, we-don’t-need-no-man, and other blatant feminist propaganda have been silenced. When it comes to a matter of life, death, and protection, men are now needed. German men are being shamed to think that it is their duty to dive headlong to protect the women of the country.

And the German men are silent.

Now, don’t get me wrong: this is still their homeland, and there should be a certain pride in defending that. They are going to need to do something if they want to avoid Germany becoming the next base of ISIS. But the fact of the matter is, they are hesitant to lift a finger to “save” women from these situations with the refugees, who were let in by the political leaders who campaign for the liberal movements.

The same women that have preached the feminist movement, shunned men in favor of careers, and forced men to learn game just to have a small chance at them are now demanding that German men lay down their lives for the cause.

The German men have every right to be silent.

Which brings me to my question…

Should You Fight for the Women of Your Country?

Fifty years ago, this question wouldn’t even be a debate. Most men worldwide would not hesitate to jump to the front lines to defend children, women, and country. The sheer fact that I can ask this question and that many, if not most, Western men will stop to ponder it just shows how far Western culture has gone downhill since the inception of feminism and the culture wars.

I think back to my grandfathers, who both willingly served in our armed forces to protect their wives and loved ones.

Because people will inevitably call me a coward, scum, and a plethora of other nice names, I think I need to simply say this: I would not hesitate to defend my loved ones; i.e. mom, sister, and (maybe) someday, a wife.

But then I think… would I fight for American women? Can you blame German men for their reaction? My path of self improvement was loaded with being treated poorly by women, as well as taking their terrible advice. While I’ve moved past the bitter and angry phase of this, and moved on with my life, the fact of the matter is that I have yet to meet an American woman worth dying for.

If there were a large supply of women that were worth dying for, it’s very likely that I would have married one of them (or been close to it) by now. I’d be thinking about starting a family and how to best raise my children. I certainly wouldn’t be writing a blog and teaching men how to improve their lives through my own struggle, because the odds are stacked against every young man born in the West these days.

But I, and many other American men, have never had that chance at a traditional, strong family. Frankly, we never will. It saddens me that if I want to find a good woman to raise a family with, I will likely have to migrate to the harsh winters of Eastern Europe, or the hurricane-prone Southeast Asian islands and leave America behind.

I don’t want it this way, but it’s simply the harsh reality of the situation. In today’s age of shunning men, extreme female promiscuity, and generally degenerate culture (celebrity worship, obesity, rape culture, etc.), why would men rush to jump in front of a bullet for a Western woman?

So I ask: why should German men be expected to now rush to defend the German women who have scorned them for so long?

For so long, us men of the West have been shamed into relenting to women’s needs and demands. This is just the next step of it: the liberal movement is now raising expectations that all men are to white knight and defend all women.

Defend women at all costs, including with your own life. On a subconscious level, humans are all aware that eggs are quite a bit more valuable than sperm. It’s why men always did fight and die for their women and children: it gave the best chance of their tribe’s survival. However, this is the first time that the feminist movement has ever been so blatant with their message: a woman’s life is infinitely more valuable than a man’s, and a man should not hesitate to give his for hers… even a complete stranger.

To prove the absurdity of their logic, let’s imagine this scenario:

If you are walking down the street one day, and a woman is being raped by a dozen refugees, the liberals would have you believe that trying to defend her is your duty as a man. That you should jump in without a moment’s hesitation and save her.

Never mind the absurdity of the situation: jumping in to defend her in a 12 on 1 situation (and at least a couple of them are likely armed) is sure to result in your death, and then her continued rape.

SJWs would shame you for “avoiding” that situation.

I’m not saying you should be an awful enough person to simply walk away and leave a woman to her doom like that (like this woman did to the man who saved her), because that would be awful. Call the cops, run them over in a car if it’s feasible: do whatever you can. But to jump into that situation with fists raised would be a suicide mission.

So no, I wouldn’t give up my life for a random woman on the street just to be a white knight hero. Why would I do that for the women of my country? The entire feminist way of thinking has worked against me my entire life: am I suddenly supposed to switch my way of thinking to “women now need a man” when it comes at the time of greatest benefit to women, and puts myself in moral peril?

It’s simply foolish, and that’s why I wrote this post.

Do Not White Knight for Western Women

If you’re a man in modern America reading this post, there is no pride in white knighting.

Sure, you may get your name in the papers and your family will get a medal of recognition of some sort. But within a week, people will forget who you are. You are just another number in the system of men who died fighting for women of your country. Liberals will sing your praises, but only until the next man dies who they can paint as a new “hero”.

Feminism has made it pretty clear that men are not important; that female life is more valuable than a man’s, and a man should throw away his own life at a moment’s notice for any woman. It doesn’t matter how many men die as long as women are saved. Again, the feminists blatantly preach that they want to have their cake and eat it, too. With all the benefits of gender equality, women are just as strong as men propaganda, and treating men like dirt, it is always desired for men to get out of the way of more capable women.

Until... it’s time to die.

They say that in the moments before death, you will see your life flash before your eyes. If you’re an average Western man, you’ve probably had your struggles. You may have been drugged as a child in school for having too much energy, when in reality, boys are just being boys. Perhaps you took the terrible advice that women gave you about women; brought them flowers, never pushed for sex, always put their needs first, and it probably resulted in you feeling alone. Or even worse, maybe you’ve been through a divorce, and had your beloved children yanked from you for no reason other than your now ex-wife simply pointed her finger and said, “He did it.”

The point I’m getting at is, don’t throw your life away for a random Western woman. If you decide to jump into the mix to white knight for the now helpless woman, when your life flashes by, the last thing you’re going to feel before your eyes close for a final time is that you were made for a fool by feminists.

Kyle blogs at This is Trouble. Check out his book, Cracking OkCupid.

Questo testo in italiano senza filmati di dissolutezza in Men of Worth Newspaper: "Il lato contadino del anti-femminismo",
Questo testo in italiano con filmati di dissolutezza in Periódico de Los Hombres de Valía: "Il lato contadino del anti-femminismo",
Ce texte en français sans films de libertinage au Men of Worth Newspaper: "Le côté paysan de le anti-féminisme",
Ce texte en français avec films de libertinage au Periódico de Los Hombres de Valía: "Le côté paysan de le anti-féminisme",
Eso texto en español sin películas de putaría en Men of Worth Newspaper: "El lado campesino del anti-feminismo",
Eso texto en español con películas de putaría en Periódico de Los Hombres de Valía: "El lado campesino del anti-feminismo",
This text in English without licentiousness movies at Men of Worth Newspaper: "The countryside of anti-feminism",
This text in English with licentiousness movies at Periódico de Los Hombres de Valía: "The countryside of anti-feminism",
Texto original em português sem filmes de putaria no A Vez das Mulheres de Verdade: "O lado rural do antifeminismo",
Texto original em português com filmes de putaria no A Vez dos Homens que Prestam: "O lado rural do antifeminismo",
Seção de sexo, safadeza, putaria, mulher pelada, pornografia
Section of sex, lust, licentiousness, naked woman, pornography
Section de sexe, luxure, débauche, femmes nues, pornographie
Sezione de sesso, libertinaggio, lussuria, donna nuda, pornografia
Sección de sexo, perrez, putaría, mujer desnuda, pornografía
Fucking in the barn
Fodendo no celeiro
Baise dans la grange
Follando en el establo
Scopando nel fienile

Fucking in the barn on TnaFlix.

Nessun commento:

Posta un commento

Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...